Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 3 Mar 2014 16:21:12 +1100
From:      John Marshall <john.marshall@riverwillow.com.au>
To:        Peter Losher <plosher@isc.org>
Cc:        hubs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Future of DNS, DNSSEC, country code delegations, etc.
Message-ID:  <20140303052112.GD1429@rwpc15.gfn.riverwillow.net.au>
In-Reply-To: <6C6F05BA-7BE5-43F6-96D1-FA184ACBF28B@isc.org>
References:  <530C59D7.30204@wemm.org> <20140303033742.GC1429@rwpc15.gfn.riverwillow.net.au> <6C6F05BA-7BE5-43F6-96D1-FA184ACBF28B@isc.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--veXX9dWIonWZEC6h
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 02 Mar 2014, 20:20 -0800, Peter Losher wrote:
> On 2 Mar 2014, at 19:37, John Marshall wrote:
>=20
> >> We (freebsd.org) use ISC's global anycasted ISC-SNS dns servers.  In o=
ur
> >> experience they have excellent coverage around the world so we'd prefe=
r to
> >> fold the *.cc.freebsd.org zone into the main freebsd.org zone (like
> >> wwwN.us.freebsd.org and ftpN.us.freebsd.org are right now).  Actual
> >> sub-zones could be done if there's a regional reachability problem but=
 I
> >> would rather not unless we absolutely had to.
> >
> > The ISC-SNS servers are, at best, ~200ms from Australia; but that is
> > better than we could expect from anything else inter-continental.
>=20
> FWIW, we (ISC) do have SNS DNS nodes via one of our network partners (ns3=
=2Eisc-sns.info) in Hong Kong and Singapore so they are in region, but it's=
 dependent on the routing table and your ISP's peering arrangements.  For e=
xample Telstra routes it all back to the US; Optus, Vocus & AAPT among othe=
rs routes it to the Asian nodes. =20
>=20
> YMMV. (I'll save folks the peering politics lecture)

Thank you, Peter, for that helpful additional information.  While it is
true that the Mileage May Vary, it doesn't make much of a difference to
the network latency.

I did some objective digging based upon your information and here are
some real numbers showing the final two hops of traceroutes to each of
the three isc-sns nodes.

=46rom a Telstra-connected host in NSW AU
---------------------------------------
IPv4
----
11  10ge1-4.core1.sjc1.he.net (72.52.92.117)  181.823 ms  187.290 ms  181.8=
16 ms
12  ns1.isc-sns.net (72.52.71.1)  182.271 ms *  182.590 ms

12  vl3512.na11.b002695-3.lax07.atlas.cogentco.com (38.20.46.42)  213.522 ms
13  ns2.isc-sns.com (38.103.2.1)  212.224 ms  210.093 ms  210.344 ms

10  if-4-28.tcore2.LVW-Los-Angeles.as6453.net (216.6.84.53)  210.467 ms * *
11  ns3.isc-sns.info (63.243.194.1)  202.985 ms  204.370 ms  201.820 ms

IPv6
----
11  10ge1-4.core1.sjc1.he.net  216.824 ms  226.081 ms  221.686 ms
12  ns1.isc-sns.net  217.777 ms  218.074 ms  219.732 ms

 8  if-xe-8-2-2.0.tcore1.TV2-Tokyo.ipv6.as6453.net  151.741 ms  151.809 ms =
 169.409 ms
 9  2405:2000:400::5  177.701 ms  180.904 ms  177.386 ms
10  ns3.isc-sns.info  179.070 ms  177.514 ms  177.479 ms


=46rom a VOCUS-connected host in QLD AU
-------------------------------------
IPv4
----
13  10ge1-4.core1.sjc1.he.net (72.52.92.117)  168.504 ms  168.319 ms  170.7=
62 ms
14  ns1.isc-sns.net (72.52.71.1)  169.328 ms  168.419 ms  168.905 ms

14  vl3812.na11.b002695-3.lax07.atlas.cogentco.com (38.20.46.50)  182.269 ms
15  ns2.isc-sns.com (38.103.2.1)  180.041 ms  180.140 ms  180.148 ms

14  if-3-2.tcore1.HK2-Hong-Kong.as6453.net (180.87.112.5)  150.309 ms  150.=
212 ms  149.295 ms
15  ns3.isc-sns.info (63.243.194.1)  150.134 ms  151.653 ms  162.848 ms

IPv6
----
10  10ge1-4.core1.sjc1.he.net  176.160 ms  187.304 ms  176.597 ms
11  ns1.isc-sns.net  176.439 ms  176.228 ms  176.412 ms

 9  globeinternet-as6453.gigabitethernet3-19.core1.lax1.he.net  176.537 ms =
 176.178 ms  176.355 ms
10  ns3.isc-sns.info  176.813 ms  176.450 ms  176.454 ms

There seems to be a common global misconception that Asian countries
are somehow "in region" for Australia, New Zealand and the South
Pacific.  That is certainly not the case with respect to the Internet.
Given a choice between using a mirror in Singapore and a mirror in San
Francisco, I would pick the San Francisco option.  The plumbing between
here and the USA yields better results.

--=20
John Marshall

--veXX9dWIonWZEC6h
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlMUEUgACgkQw/tAaKKahKLEYACdELmmprZPbnTbZd/cwxD3/zds
BE4AoI0s3jySFN0N0hJ4WAKuytdS/hEH
=+9vF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--veXX9dWIonWZEC6h--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140303052112.GD1429>