Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Jun 2005 02:27:10 +0700
From:      Vadim Goncharov <vadim_nuclight@mail.ru>
To:        freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SPAM: Score 2.0: Re[2]: FreeBSD entry on Wikipedia
Message-ID:  <166222081.20050621022710@tpu.ru>
In-Reply-To: <6F2F8FD3FBCF7A489CB18912A4807EBA0E0853@mvwcim1a.acuson.com>
References:  <6F2F8FD3FBCF7A489CB18912A4807EBA0E0853@mvwcim1a.acuson.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Johnson,

Tuesday, June 21, 2005, 2:17:06 AM, you wrote:

>> That sentence is right.
JD> Technically, it is correct. But it may imply something that
JD> isn't correct. If you look at the discussion page, the editor who
JD> added that phrase used the analogy of FreeBSD running a children's
JD> footrace. Putting those together, there's a clear implication by

Yes, but does end user cares about that discussions? We should give
strong techincal and honest arguments. This will make a better
impression.

JD> that editor that FreeBSD cannot compete with "adult" systems. That's
JD> nonsense. 

Yes, with about 30 years of history FreeBSD is more "adult" than many
others.

-- 
  WBR, Vadim Goncharov 
FidoNet 2:5005/106.426  ICQ#166852181  mailto:vadim_nuclight@mail.ru




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?166222081.20050621022710>