Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 23:43:11 -0400 From: Christopher Sean Hilton <chris@vindaloo.com> To: John Almberg <jalmberg@identry.com> Cc: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why would it make such a difference to move mysqld to another machine? Message-ID: <90933D43-DFDB-4A71-AC98-8B0BAE9155A7@vindaloo.com> In-Reply-To: <6F9BC84B-3A11-4D1F-85EB-7E52020A1532@identry.com> References: <E46D5ADF-51F4-4393-BDEC-79FE02E4A574@identry.com> <4870894E.7090708@infracaninophile.co.uk> <200807061759.12129.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <6F9BC84B-3A11-4D1F-85EB-7E52020A1532@identry.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 6, 2008, at 5:10 PM, John Almberg wrote:
>> Since MySQL is clearly the bottleneck of the sites, I'd investigate
>> why in the
>> world apache2 needs >150M per process.
>
> Now that was a darn good question.
>
> I ran httpd -M and got a list of 60 loaded modules... duh.
>
> I said before I'm just a beginner Admin. I'm learning a lot, but
> some of these basic things, I just haven't run into, yet. Obviously,
> Apache 2 gets loaded with a whole bunch of default modules? I didn't
> realize that, before.
>
> Okay... I need to figure out which ones I really need. Thanks for
> push in the right direction...
My apologies on that one. You're right. I read 2150M as 2 Megabytes.
It's obviously 2G which should be plenty of RAM for mysqld.
-- Chris
--
Chris Hilton chris-at-vindaloo-dot-com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"All I was doing was trying to get home from work!"
-- Rosa Parks
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?90933D43-DFDB-4A71-AC98-8B0BAE9155A7>