Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:40:12 -0400 From: alexus <alexus@gmail.com> To: "Patrick Vanguardia" <pvanguardia@gmail.com> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE Message-ID: <6ae50c2d0810201440p70c9cc86h8de33bd3569723e7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6ae50c2d0810201437j7a866be1q3ca46c3bb8886069@mail.gmail.com> References: <4f95f7db0810120719j323efd4eh1923f1744f0f4fd6@mail.gmail.com> <20081012153425.I2978@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <4f95f7db0810120852l18e44fdbp26ad9adc5a59bc4c@mail.gmail.com> <20081012161551.B2978@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <4f95f7db0810121143u1f6aaaa8jb363490f3ef42195@mail.gmail.com> <6ae50c2d0810201437j7a866be1q3ca46c3bb8886069@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bjoern A. Zeeb Do you know if we going see your patch in 7.1-RELEASE? On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 5:37 PM, alexus <alexus@gmail.com> wrote: > I dont know seems like for me it's missing something > > > d# patch -C < ~alexus/20080617-01-jail-7.0R.diff > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |Index: lib/libc/sys/jail.2 > |=================================================================== > |RCS file: /shared/mirror/FreeBSD/r/ncvs/src/lib/libc/sys/jail.2,v > |retrieving revision 1.28 > |diff -u -p -r1.28 jail.2 > |--- lib/libc/sys/jail.2 9 Feb 2005 18:03:14 -0000 1.28 > |+++ lib/libc/sys/jail.2 18 Jun 2008 22:30:42 -0000 > -------------------------- > Patching file lib/libc/sys/jail.2 using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 8. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 32. > Hunk #3 succeeded at 58. > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |Index: sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32.h > |=================================================================== > |RCS file: /shared/mirror/FreeBSD/r/ncvs/src/sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32.h,v > |retrieving revision 1.6.2.1 > |diff -u -p -r1.6.2.1 freebsd32.h > |--- sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32.h 19 Dec 2007 20:37:53 -0000 1.6.2.1 > |+++ sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32.h 18 Jun 2008 22:30:54 -0000 > -------------------------- > Patching file sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32.h using Plan A... > Hunk #1 failed at 153. > 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32.h.rej > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |Index: sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_misc.c > |=================================================================== > |RCS file: /shared/mirror/FreeBSD/r/ncvs/src/sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_misc.c,v > |retrieving revision 1.67.2.3 > |diff -u -p -r1.67.2.3 freebsd32_misc.c > |--- sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_misc.c 20 Dec 2007 19:43:55 -0000 1.67.2.3 > |+++ sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_misc.c 18 Jun 2008 22:30:54 -0000 > -------------------------- > Patching file sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_misc.c using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 37 with fuzz 2 (offset -1 lines). > Hunk #2 succeeded at 1778 with fuzz 1 (offset -186 lines). > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |Index: sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_proto.h > |=================================================================== > |RCS file: /shared/mirror/FreeBSD/r/ncvs/src/sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_proto.h,v > |retrieving revision 1.78.2.1 > |diff -u -p -r1.78.2.1 freebsd32_proto.h > |--- sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_proto.h 19 Dec 2007 20:48:53 -0000 1.78.2.1 > |+++ sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_proto.h 18 Jun 2008 22:30:54 -0000 > -------------------------- > Patching file sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_proto.h using Plan A... > Hunk #1 failed at 223. > Hunk #2 failed at 367. > Hunk #3 failed at 571. > 3 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to > sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_proto.h.rej > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |Index: sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_syscall.h > |=================================================================== > |RCS file: /shared/mirror/FreeBSD/r/ncvs/src/sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_syscall.h,v > |retrieving revision 1.76.2.1 > |diff -u -p -r1.76.2.1 freebsd32_syscall.h > |--- sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_syscall.h 19 Dec 2007 20:48:53 > -0000 1.76.2.1 > |+++ sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_syscall.h 18 Jun 2008 22:30:54 -0000 > -------------------------- > Patching file sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_syscall.h using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 254 with fuzz 2. > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |Index: sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_syscalls.c > |=================================================================== > |RCS file: /shared/mirror/FreeBSD/r/ncvs/src/sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_syscalls.c,v > |retrieving revision 1.67.2.1 > |diff -u -p -r1.67.2.1 freebsd32_syscalls.c > |--- sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_syscalls.c 19 Dec 2007 20:48:53 > -0000 1.67.2.1 > |+++ sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_syscalls.c 18 Jun 2008 22:30:54 -0000 > -------------------------- > Patching file sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_syscalls.c using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 345 with fuzz 2. > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |Index: sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_sysent.c > |=================================================================== > |RCS file: /shared/mirror/FreeBSD/r/ncvs/src/sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_sysent.c,v > |retrieving revision 1.77.2.1 > |diff -u -p -r1.77.2.1 freebsd32_sysent.c > |--- sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_sysent.c 19 Dec 2007 20:48:53 -0000 1.77.2.1 > |+++ sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_sysent.c 18 Jun 2008 22:30:54 -0000 > -------------------------- > Patching file sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_sysent.c using Plan A... > Hunk #1 failed at 377. > 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to > sys/compat/freebsd32/freebsd32_sysent.c.rej > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |Index: sys/compat/freebsd32/syscalls.master > |=================================================================== > |RCS file: /shared/mirror/FreeBSD/r/ncvs/src/sys/compat/freebsd32/syscalls.master,v > |retrieving revision 1.91.2.2 > |diff -u -p -r1.91.2.2 syscalls.master > |--- sys/compat/freebsd32/syscalls.master 19 Dec 2007 20:43:41 -0000 1.91.2.2 > |+++ sys/compat/freebsd32/syscalls.master 18 Jun 2008 22:30:54 -0000 > -------------------------- > Patching file sys/compat/freebsd32/syscalls.master using Plan A... > Hunk #1 failed at 566. > 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to > sys/compat/freebsd32/syscalls.master.rej > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |Index: sys/compat/linux/linux_misc.c > |=================================================================== > |RCS file: /shared/mirror/FreeBSD/r/ncvs/src/sys/compat/linux/linux_misc.c,v > |retrieving revision 1.214 > |diff -u -p -r1.214 linux_misc.c > |--- sys/compat/linux/linux_misc.c 28 Aug 2007 12:26:35 -0000 1.214 > |+++ sys/compat/linux/linux_misc.c 18 Jun 2008 22:30:55 -0000 > -------------------------- > Patching file sys/compat/linux/linux_misc.c using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 38 with fuzz 1 (offset -1 lines). > Hunk #2 succeeded at 48 with fuzz 2 (offset -1 lines). > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |Index: sys/ddb/db_ps.c > |=================================================================== > |RCS file: /shared/mirror/FreeBSD/r/ncvs/src/sys/ddb/db_ps.c,v > |retrieving revision 1.66 > |diff -u -p -r1.66 db_ps.c > |--- sys/ddb/db_ps.c 17 Sep 2007 05:27:19 -0000 1.66 > |+++ sys/ddb/db_ps.c 18 Jun 2008 22:30:56 -0000 > -------------------------- > Patching file sys/ddb/db_ps.c using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 32. > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |Index: sys/kern/kern_jail.c > |=================================================================== > |RCS file: /shared/mirror/FreeBSD/r/ncvs/src/sys/kern/kern_jail.c,v > |retrieving revision 1.70 > |diff -u -p -r1.70 kern_jail.c > |--- sys/kern/kern_jail.c 13 Apr 2007 23:54:22 -0000 1.70 > |+++ sys/kern/kern_jail.c 18 Jun 2008 22:31:00 -0000 > -------------------------- > Patching file sys/kern/kern_jail.c using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 10 with fuzz 2. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 36 with fuzz 2 (offset -1 lines). > Hunk #3 succeeded at 58 (offset -1 lines). > Hunk #4 failed at 85. > Hunk #5 succeeded at 111 with fuzz 2 (offset -21 lines). > Hunk #6 failed at 242. > Hunk #7 succeeded at 364 with fuzz 1 (offset -21 lines). > Hunk #8 succeeded at 449 (offset -14 lines). > Hunk #9 succeeded at 570 (offset -27 lines). > Hunk #10 failed at 589. > Hunk #11 succeeded at 1021 (offset -382 lines). > Hunk #12 failed at 1034. > Hunk #13 succeeded at 1458 (offset -18 lines). > 4 out of 13 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/kern/kern_jail.c.rej > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |Index: sys/kern/kern_priv.c > |=================================================================== > |RCS file: /shared/mirror/FreeBSD/r/ncvs/src/sys/kern/kern_priv.c,v > |retrieving revision 1.4 > |diff -u -p -r1.4 kern_priv.c > |--- sys/kern/kern_priv.c 2 Jul 2007 14:03:29 -0000 1.4 > |+++ sys/kern/kern_priv.c 18 Jun 2008 22:31:00 -0000 > -------------------------- > File to patch: > > > On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Patrick Vanguardia > <pvanguardia@gmail.com> wrote: >> ic, thanks, i think i successfully run it one thing i noticed is that when i >> run ifconfig it only shows 1 IP >> >> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb < >> bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008, Patrick Vanguardia wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Thanks Bjoern. Yes I will not expect any update from it but is it already >>>> stable (fully functional)? any known bugs in this release? >>>> >>> >>> well people ran it as they had asked for it. if you would have Cc:ed >>> the lists someone might have showed up next week end told you. Run a >>> poll there;-) >>> >>> I have never ran it for production or anything. >>> You may want to check if there had been any follow-ups to tha patch >>> (take the date from the filename) and check to find the posting where >>> I had posted the patch: >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/ >>> >>> >>> It's not as complete as a releng_7 patch as releng_7 has cpuset that >>> 7.0-R did not have yet, sctp still was disabled, ... >>> >>> Apart from that nothing pops out of my head. >>> >>> >>> /bz >>> >>> -- >>> Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game. >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > > -- > http://alexus.org/ > -- http://alexus.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6ae50c2d0810201440p70c9cc86h8de33bd3569723e7>