Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 17:55:47 +0900
From: Tatsuki Makino <tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com>
To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>
Cc: Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: In some places, WITH_${feature}_PORTS doesn't work
Message-ID: <SI2PR01MB5036A588DAC2208DA5D671FBFA042@SI2PR01MB5036.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <6dzfc6cvav4ruai6yzeeqhy5o6pkcfxif6y5tj4vuezhay2uqe@dshkqacwra3m>
References: <SI2PR01MB5036300AACCBCAE6FF4A9E44FA052@SI2PR01MB5036.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> <CALH631m9g%2BonVYD1do2grMj2LCC2prNbQZriog9TL=XzEBWQQQ@mail.gmail.com> <SI2PR01MB50365398DB2B37D3CDEB3994FA052@SI2PR01MB5036.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> <CALH631=d3XuYXqFQf6e73-saSm1-o7LhVQ41thuGG328mfqk0g@mail.gmail.com> <SI2PR01MB5036545DADEF96C62C97F3E5FA052@SI2PR01MB5036.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> <6dzfc6cvav4ruai6yzeeqhy5o6pkcfxif6y5tj4vuezhay2uqe@dshkqacwra3m>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mathieu Arnold wrote on 2024/04/12 15:53: > No, no, you should not do that, :) It is difficult to prioritize when there are two methods, WITH_*_PORTS and WITHOUT_*_PORTS. Perhaps we have experienced even something like "Order allow,deny Allow from ... Deny from ..." :) I wondered if a new variable had arisen to resolve that.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?SI2PR01MB5036A588DAC2208DA5D671FBFA042>