Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:36:46 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> To: Ganbold <ganbold@micom.mng.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: fxp0: device timeout and sk0: watchdog timeout problems Message-ID: <20060118023646.GA40276@rndsoft.co.kr> In-Reply-To: <7.0.0.16.2.20060118102336.03fbcef8@micom.mng.net> References: <7.0.0.16.2.20060118090616.04209af8@micom.mng.net> <20060118015515.GB39792@rndsoft.co.kr> <7.0.0.16.2.20060118102336.03fbcef8@micom.mng.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:28:43AM +0800, Ganbold wrote: > At 09:55 AM 1/18/2006, you wrote: > > > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > > > > > > I used new if_sk codes from Pyun YongHyeon but after 2 days I got > > > same problem device timeout. > > > fxp is also timing out and I don't know why. > > > Any idea? > > > > > > >If sk(4) is the cause of problem fxp wouldn't be affected. > > I guess so. But fxp also times out almost at same time as sk does. > > >Of course it's possible for sk(4) to corrupt kernel memory structure > >but the possibility is low. While fixing sk(4) I pushed sk(4) to the > >limit on sparc64. I never met such timeouts. > > > >atm I have no clue. How about updated sk(4)? > >http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/if_sk.c > >http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/if_skreg.h > > Is it new update? Because I used your update dated on Jan 12 2006. Is > it newer than that? > Yes. > >Disabling sk(4) remedy your issue? > > There is another on-board pcn NIC, I will try if problem exists with sk > driver. > Ok. Thank you. -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060118023646.GA40276>