Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 13:38:22 +0300 From: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> To: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: freebsd-stable stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: GEOM RAID devd events Message-ID: <51FA3A9E.4030307@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <7128E2A7-19E6-4BD2-8F87-37F75CC39087@gsoft.com.au> References: <7E9F5FA5-16FE-4E5D-986A-598941A0D3AC@gsoft.com.au> <51FA2E79.8070705@FreeBSD.org> <9B76700D-0388-4452-BB8A-A4A252CB00A1@gsoft.com.au> <7128E2A7-19E6-4BD2-8F87-37F75CC39087@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01.08.2013 13:27, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > On 01/08/2013, at 19:56, Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> wrote: >>> GEOM RAID does not do anything special about devd now. I had no such plans, but probably that is a not a bad idea if do it well. >> >> Do you have a recommendation for where I should start looking? (ie a hint about where such a thing would go) > > After doing the reading I should have done before I sent my last message I see that g_raid_update_* look good candidates. That would be nice to do it is possibly more generic way to be usable for other GEOM classes, such as MIRROR, MULTIPATH, etc. At least make messages formatting unified. -- Alexander Motin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51FA3A9E.4030307>