Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:00:07 +0200 From: Bernhard Schmidt <bschmidt@techwires.net> To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Oops! (was: Support for Intel 5100 WiFi ?) Message-ID: <201210122100.07216.bschmidt@techwires.net> In-Reply-To: <71855.1349997081@tristatelogic.com> References: <71855.1349997081@tristatelogic.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 12 October 2012 01:11:21 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > In message <CAJ-Vmomb4Qm3sxQ-558FXiEe4ZJarYBRmvAKY-iT6-H5dXw_LQ@mail.gmail.com> > , you wrote: > > >What's the output of 'ifconfig wlanX list sta'? > > % ifconfig wlan0 list sta > ADDR AID CHAN RATE RSSI IDLE TXSEQ RXSEQ CAPS FLAG > c0:c1:c0:8b:4b:f3 1 11 36M 11.5 0 85 37120 EP AQEHTRS RSN HTCAP WPS WME This is the expected result. iwn(4) still (ab)uses the legacy rate control algo for 11n. This means that you get the real 11n throughput because the legacy rates are translated to MCS rates, but, the reported rates are still legacy. -- Bernhard
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201210122100.07216.bschmidt>