Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:54:24 +0800
From:      Erich Dollansky <oceanare@pacific.net.sg>
To:        Palle Girgensohn <girgen@pingpong.net>
Cc:        freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: AMD or Intel?
Message-ID:  <46E52260.60000@pacific.net.sg>
In-Reply-To: <74611C396F3A6D027B0E8ABA@rambutan.pingpong.net>
References:  <E6C9DBADAE3839B380B736D7@rambutan.pingpong.net>	<46E51D32.5070803@pacific.net.sg> <74611C396F3A6D027B0E8ABA@rambutan.pingpong.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

Palle Girgensohn wrote:
> 
> 
>>> Now, I hear rumors that AMD is to be preferred over Intel for
>>> performance reasons. Any comments on that? Are we better off getting AMD
>>> processors, when running Unix?
>>>
>> AMD announced today the new quad core. Their benchmarks are promising.
>>
>> But not the dual core versions.
> 
> OK, thanks! But this means they can't deliver very soon, I guess, so I'd 
> better stick to woodcrest if I want to buy something soon.
> 
they are delivering already. Those German guys have had real silicon to 
test with. I have no idea how long it will take to get one if your name 
is not Sun or Cray.

I think it is very simple for you. If they are not available the moment 
you want to buy, you will buy Intel.

Erich



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46E52260.60000>