Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 11:23:02 +0100 From: Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= <uqs@freebsd.org> To: Philip Paeps <philip@freebsd.org> Cc: git@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git log --graph in the face of vendor imports Message-ID: <X%2BhghovUdhfNxXay@acme.spoerlein.net> In-Reply-To: <74BD2398-30BD-442D-9658-46E6079C5C36@freebsd.org> References: <EE8C8A14-B828-402F-AE2C-68B3E214A1CF@freebsd.org> <X%2BcPAW2%2B1VKK1vuw@acme.spoerlein.net> <74BD2398-30BD-442D-9658-46E6079C5C36@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2020-12-27 at 09:22:59 +0800, Philip Paeps wrote: >On 2020-12-26 18:22:57 (+0800), Ulrich Spörlein wrote: >> On Sat, 2020-12-26 at 11:29:41 +0800, Philip Paeps wrote: >>> I have this alias to make `git log --graph` meaningful: >>> >>> ``` >>> [alias] >>> llog = log --graph >>> --pretty=format:'%C(yellow)%h%C(red)%d%Creset %s %C(blue)- %an, >>> %ar%Creset' >>> ``` >>> >>> I noticed that in our repository, the graph shifts farther to the >>> right >>> with each vendor import. Is this expected behaviour? >> >> Yes. Fun fact: the right combination of format flags makes git >> segfault! > >Oh good. It's not just me for once. ;-) > >Though I haven't managed to make it segfault yet. I'm sure it's only a >matter of time. > >I just wanted to make sure that the "drifting to the right" was >expected. It looks odd. > >Philip log --graph is probably useless for the FreeBSD repo, as we don't have any other development branches other than main. Stable and co are just receiving cherry-picks and vendor branches don't see any "development" per se. Only merges between user/projects and main would be of interest, but they are littered with "IFC" merges and make everything a thousand times worse, so I'm not recording all those IFCs as merges. Cheers Uli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?X%2BhghovUdhfNxXay>