Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 19:57:08 -0700 From: Ade Lovett <ade@freebsd.org> To: Matthew Jacob <lydianconcepts@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Current favorite FC HBA? Message-ID: <6BF5AB95-9A4D-4ABD-9717-6623F274CFCD@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <7579f7fb0607161131h19a995ffjeceda64feb4d7a7a@mail.gmail.com> References: <813466C3-8E34-4886-9689-044086F4F64C@dragondata.com> <7376DAAA-4C67-495F-A532-5A86C47E8F75@FreeBSD.org> <7579f7fb0607140806q1cf1baf4q24a6f2ec14118a54@mail.gmail.com> <3B9652BC-027D-4FC5-A2E9-3CD7AF12DC4B@freebsd.org> <7579f7fb0607161131h19a995ffjeceda64feb4d7a7a@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 16, 2006, at 11:31 , Matthew Jacob wrote: > I'm trying to get the 2422 support complete. Oh, cool. Drop me a note when you're ready, and I should be able to poke around in my budgets somewhere for some test gear. > Wait a year. SAS/SATA will blow both away for nearline. Maybe, I'm not so sure. Certainly in terms of throughput, SAS/SATA are relatively close to their SCSI/FCAL counterparts, but I have a number of systems where the throughput is pretty small, but the IO operations/second are (very) high. The SATA drives I've tried in that role have failed miserably compared to their SCSI brethren. -aDe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6BF5AB95-9A4D-4ABD-9717-6623F274CFCD>