Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:08:11 -0500 From: John Wilson <solita2@solitarylight.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X servers Message-ID: <20040711200811.4aae968d.solita2@solitarylight.com> In-Reply-To: <75f3f70504071116405845fc32@mail.gmail.com> References: <1089277280.236.12.camel@Desolation> <20040708232618.531e6fd7@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <200407091324.16445.kirk@strauser.com> <20040711175514.GA21000@lori.mine.nu> <20040711174256.2046a84b@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <75f3f70504071116405845fc32@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:40:03 -0700 Roop Nanuwa <roop.nanuwa@gmail.com> wrote: [...] > point but I was referring to things like window compositing and other > eye candy features. Personally, I'd much prefer to see things like "eye candy" take a back seat to stability, hardware support and performance enhancements/optimization of code. Eye candy should best be left up to the various window managers. - John.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040711200811.4aae968d.solita2>