Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:11:40 +0200
From:      Eduardo Morras <emorrasg@yahoo.es>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: The small installations network filesystem and users.
Message-ID:  <20160628181140.933d144cd5d830275e4be6c3@yahoo.es>
In-Reply-To: <761f82d3-ebe9-2cba-9499-049dafbc98df@freebsd.org>
References:  <CACpH0MdJ0YjtB-H5h-7u%2BdC%2BbbjVhN-Y7ejM7u7W-SL01qC3aA@mail.gmail.com> <9BB7E8B3-EC0E-457E-B2B2-FB80B1CF02B0@gmail.com> <CACpH0MfYAe4JG5r3QmZ7B9jZWR3DTf-Hfb8Xrq1JiKdGpG5i0Q@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.GSO.4.64.1606202130170.10181@sea.ntplx.net> <20160621075631.38c2eeaa7c224aa22ea9be4d@aei.mpg.de> <761f82d3-ebe9-2cba-9499-049dafbc98df@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 21:04:45 +0800
Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On 21/06/2016 1:56 PM, Gerrit K=FChn wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 22:00:31 -0400 (EDT) Daniel Eischen
> > <deischen@freebsd.org> wrote about Re: The small installations
> > network filesystem and users.:
> >
> > DE> We should support LDAP client out of the box, in base.  What
> > DE> sucks now is that we need 3 packages (plus their dependencies)
> > DE> and multiple config files for ldap:
> > DE>
> > DE>    pam_ldap
> > DE>    nss_ldap
> > DE>    openldap-client
> >
> > I only have to install/config ldap-clients every now and then, but
> > I would also strongly favour a more "integrated" setup (if that
> > requires having it in base is a different question, though). A few
> > weeks ago I used nss-pam-ldapd instead of pam_ldap and nss_ldap for
> > the first time, and it appeared to work with a bit less of a hassle
> > for me (otoh, I don't do any funky things here, I just need a
> > replacement for what we did with NIS something like 20 years ago).
>=20
> +1
> I just had to reinstall certs for my server.  which means copying=20
> certs to several places (in a default config)
> sendmail and syrus ad openssl (base) all look in different places.
> you COULD make them all look in the same place
> but that requires undersanding what is going on and not just cribbing=20
> the config file off the net somewhere.

I use dhcpd to pass that configuration. On system startup, dhclient
asks to dhcpd server the ip, time-ntp, dns, and configuration for its
current job (pkgs/ports to install, apache conf, postgres conf, certs, etc.=
.)
depending on it's intended current use. I followed an old paper from
EuroBSDCon,... this
http://2004.eurobsdcon.org/uploads/media/EBSD04_slides_41.pdf to do the
setup. Easier and faster (at least for me) than ldap and related for
server setup. For user management, don't know, I don't have jelly
users, only daemons.

>=20
> I think ports and pkg are fine, but we need to have some more thought=20
> put into how they all go together.



---   ---
Eduardo Morras <emorrasg@yahoo.es>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160628181140.933d144cd5d830275e4be6c3>