Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 08:40:28 +0100 From: "Patrick M. Hausen" <hausen@punkt.de> To: David Powers via freebsd-virtualization <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: The status of docker Message-ID: <FE466DD8-8FF9-43B4-8D5E-1AF8FEEE798F@punkt.de> In-Reply-To: <7A86028D-C413-4063-84D8-5AB985EAD2A0@kraus-haus.org> References: <089e330d-2761-2440-3b7f-dd22e9088af5@gjunka.com> <9A01020A-7CC6-4893-A425-11A7BF736F4E@ultra-secure.de> <42f59b63-fdc7-306f-d836-83533741a86c@FreeBSD.org> <CAG=rPVfTZnYc6%2BDjtk0SjkqijJQh6uA1G9VWEBsYy4aDYvYEgQ@mail.gmail.com> <CC0F6FB5-7939-4586-86DD-B5548E0043C3@punkt.de> <5c926314-adce-dba1-f5ce-2fda35e1aeba@gjunka.com> <FDDC8A58-8AD3-4D07-B0B3-0BDFA214ABA0@punkt.de> <7A86028D-C413-4063-84D8-5AB985EAD2A0@kraus-haus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Good morning, > Am 28.01.2019 um 03:53 schrieb Paul Kraus <paul@kraus-haus.org>: > (Open)Solaris already had Linux Brand zones, which I=E2=80=99m sure = helped get there much faster. > They could already run Linux (user space) in a Zone. Yes, but how did they get there? Is there some technical reason why Linux branded zones are =E2=80=9Eso far ahead=E2=80=9C of = FreeBSD=E2=80=99s Linux ABI that they can run native Docker images while FreeBSD can=E2=80=99t? Or is it just a matter of money and manpower invested? Kind regards, Patrick --=20 punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Kaiserallee 13a Tel.: 0721 9109-0 Fax: -100 76133 Karlsruhe info@punkt.de http://punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Gf: Juergen Egeling
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FE466DD8-8FF9-43B4-8D5E-1AF8FEEE798F>