Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:52:34 -0500
From:      "Zaphod Beeblebrox" <zbeeble@gmail.com>
To:        "Garrett Cooper" <yanefbsd@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: AMD64 qemu completely broken?
Message-ID:  <5f67a8c40812040952u1364563awcfd493695e7fea7c@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7d6fde3d0812040327w7c92826i64c6073a453d65ef@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <5f67a8c40812021718i4cc225fem5b02a448702ec606@mail.gmail.com> <7d6fde3d0812040327w7c92826i64c6073a453d65ef@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 6:27 AM, Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Are you running the ports version, or a different version, and/or are
> you using kqemu (I've heard this was broken, in the past)? My group at
> Cisco has several issues with older versions of qemu for PPC and when
> we applied patches, it improved support greatly in some cases, and
> introduced bugs in other cases =\.
>
> I'd definitely hit the devel list for QEMU and see what they say while
> you're waiting for a more substantial reply here.


I'm using the ports version.  I am using kqemu... although I can try without
the kernel module later today.

How out-of-date is the port?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5f67a8c40812040952u1364563awcfd493695e7fea7c>