Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:22:12 -0800 (PST) From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> To: Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Change select(2) to kevent(2) on script(1)... Message-ID: <Pine.OSX.4.64.0812221220160.1423@peregrin.local> In-Reply-To: <7d6fde3d0812221215t24b401e9ue180bc915d16d92c@mail.gmail.com> References: <20081221012752.cdc5cbfc.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20081221211949.GS1176@hoeg.nl> <20081222091203.GA28920@freebsd.org> <494F740E.3040502@FreeBSD.org> <20081223002901.9b71e60d.nork@FreeBSD.org> <f19c444a0812220759i44707666oc91e25cda225d75b@mail.gmail.com> <7d6fde3d0812221215t24b401e9ue180bc915d16d92c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Would partitioning out the select(2) code and #ifdef'ing it to mux > between the kevent(2) and select(2) interfaces be a prudent measure to > follow? No. This is just adding complexity for adding complexity's sake. The existing code works fine. Leave it alone. --lyndon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSX.4.64.0812221220160.1423>