Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 18:44:03 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@andreaventuroli.it> To: Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>, xfce@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XFCE upgraded to 4.16 Message-ID: <6e8ec4ab-0382-7eae-e623-5f48df2f10c7@andreaventuroli.it> In-Reply-To: <7f9cc4b4-81aa-354e-4bf5-c4867ca51d13@madpilot.net> References: <46a21428-a640-f895-0f3b-f44c09497bf5@madpilot.net> <747ecac6-6d60-6143-1ae1-47801299b59b@netfence.it> <1502a321-02c0-13e9-16b3-6f11da9de3af@madpilot.net> <47ede65d-817a-8d80-a582-660d43ac6ac3@andreaventuroli.it> <ee9f59de-8814-cf6d-cf8a-ff13a88dccd2@madpilot.net> <7f9cc4b4-81aa-354e-4bf5-c4867ca51d13@madpilot.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/4/21 6:22 PM, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 04/01/21 18:02, Guido Falsi wrote: >> On 04/01/21 17:43, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >>> P.S. >>> Just out of curiosity: why weren't these ports removed, since we all >>> know they were going to stop working? >> >> Why remove them while they are still working fine? >> > > BTW, some already had a deprecation notice. I know. What I meant was not to remove them early; I was just curious why they weren't removed at the same time XFCE 4.16 was introduced, since they stopped working on that same day. Rationale is: don't waste time trying to build them, since it's useless. bye av.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6e8ec4ab-0382-7eae-e623-5f48df2f10c7>