Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 14:16:47 -0800 From: Chris <portmaster@BSDforge.com> To: Theron <theron.tarigo@gmail.com> Cc: <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: When to use TMPPLIST instead of pkg-plist? Message-ID: <913f7a767bef8434939bd68225eb1a69@udns.ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <82e555d3-f75a-ecd3-e72a-4d0b63a8a40c@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 14:30:14 -0500 Theron theron=2Etarigo@gmail=2Ecom said > On 2020-02-29 14:44, Bob Eager wrote: > > make makeplist > > > > I believe > > > Indeed=2E=C2=A0 A port may also provide its own definition of makeplist=20 > (ideally preserving the /you/have/to/check/=2E=2E=2E nag) to make maintenance= =20 > easier, but any changes to resulting pkg-plist can still be easily seen= =20 > by version control=2E=C2=A0 Is providing such helpers encouraged / discoura= ged=20 > as a policy? It's a tool, in an aid for automation/convenience=2E A good maintainer will recognize that, and act accordingly=2E :) IOW it's not 100%, and it's output is subject to scrutiny by the maintainer= =2E --Chris >=20 > Theron
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?913f7a767bef8434939bd68225eb1a69>