Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 21:48:55 +0200 From: Dobri Dobrev <ddobrev85@gmail.com> To: Kristof Provost <kp@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PF not keeping counters in a counters-defined table Message-ID: <CAJHkgnfgzci6SBaN5Z=Qp_AuzY=DU09Rb7et5yCqb8351FOjMw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <83031927-43B1-4B9F-981E-CD77620DE5E5@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAJHkgnf=0-PMPGRm0-K_rNoKO7w-RHTSVVnLuDNLM7o_G4=eAg@mail.gmail.com> <DFFD64A3-2B3D-42A5-BFF2-47D6542D6930@FreeBSD.org> <CAJHkgnfpYZD2qmMJjE=dQX8xnAGwb0e5mvCyc6Xz2JFD_N2JfQ@mail.gmail.com> <83031927-43B1-4B9F-981E-CD77620DE5E5@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hopefully someone else will be able to help. On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 9:42 PM Kristof Provost <kp@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 5 Jan 2021, at 20:35, Dobri Dobrev wrote: > > You are correct, Kristof. > > > > If I place the table in the rdr rule - it starts keeping counters, > > however, > > what is the point of having the ability to place a table in a > > rdr-anchor > > rule in the first place, if it won't be able to keep counters? > > > Tables are not just about counters. They=E2=80=99re about making a rule f= ilter > on a whole selection of addresses (or ranges). > In this case you=E2=80=99re choosing to filter what traffic may go into t= he > anchor. > Maybe consider not filtering on the rdr-anchor rule, but on the rdr rule > in the anchor itself? > > > I'm doing the followi ng scenario: > > table <xyztable> counters > > table <othertable> persist > > > > rdr-anchor "ASDFGH" on igb0 proto tcp from <xyztable> to any port 123 > > no-rdr on igb0 from any to <othertable> port 123 > > rdr-anchor "ASDFGH" on igb0 proto tcp from any to any port 123 > > > > load anchor ASDFGH from "/etc/ASDFGH-anchor" > > # contents of /etc/ASDFGH-anchor: > > # (tested separately) > > # rdr on igb0 proto tcp from any to 192.168.0.1 port 123 -> > > 192.168.0.1 > > port 124 # no counters > > # rdr on igb0 proto tcp from <xyztable> to 192.168.0.1 port 123 -> > > 192.168.0.1 port 124 # counters working > > > > So, in this case - how do I keep counters in the <xyztable> without > > breaking the current "workflow"? > > If IP 192.168.0.1 is not in <othertabe> and I have <xyztable> on all > > rdr > > rules @ the anchor - I won't ever be able to reach > > 123->192.168.0.1:124 > > > > Is there a way? > > I have no idea, and I=E2=80=99m not the best person to talk to about how = to > configure your firewall. > > Best regards, > Kristof >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJHkgnfgzci6SBaN5Z=Qp_AuzY=DU09Rb7et5yCqb8351FOjMw>