Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:06:25 +0100 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen <torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006 ) Message-ID: <20051223180625.36e225a3.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <84dead720512230740m732add82i95416281be335a80@mail.gmail.com> References: <200512232058.14651.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <27065.1135334352@critter.freebsd.dk> <84dead720512230740m732add82i95416281be335a80@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:10:19 +0530 Joseph Koshy <joseph.koshy@gmail.com> wrote: > www.infrastructures.org > www.isconf.org and perhaps also http://www.cfengine.org/ and probably others. IMHO, FreeBSD is a good os, with good options on configuration and management. It is not a systems management tool / system, and (IMHO) it shoildn't try to be that either. Let those who need it build the necessary tools to do large scale FreeBSD administration and maintenance. If the tool is good, it will be used. So far, I have read only a lot of bikeshedding. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen, Norway
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051223180625.36e225a3.torfinn.ingolfsen>