Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:42:35 -0400 From: Paul Kraus <paul@kraus-haus.org> To: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Replacing Drive with SSD Message-ID: <08306F31-955B-4710-B20B-4F2ABE0CBA56@kraus-haus.org> In-Reply-To: <867fnywc8i.fsf@WorkBox.Home> References: <CEAD84AD-341A-4FB9-A3A1-D0D5A550AFFD@lafn.org> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1508281235390.74312@wonkity.com> <20150829220311.c7608be1.freebsd@edvax.de> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1508300633160.44682@wonkity.com> <55E45973.2050103@sneakertech.com> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1508311000550.42983@wonkity.com> <55E4865B.1000104@sneakertech.com> <20150831181135.7682a810@gumby.homeunix.com> <867fnywc8i.fsf@WorkBox.Home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sep 10, 2015, at 11:00, Brandon J. Wandersee <brandon.wandersee@gmail.com> wrote: > Leaving blocks unpartitioned doesn't mean those blocks won't be written > to; it just ensures that a certain amount of space (and so a certain > number of blocks/cells) must always be free, forcing writes to be spread > across different physical portions of the disk in a relatively even > manner. It's my understanding that this over-provisioning isn't > exactly necessary in most SSDs nowadays. It just serves as a stronger > guarantee than entrusting everything to a drive's firmware. Each SSD model has some amount of over provisioning built in. The more expensive, Enterprise grade SSDs have more (in many cases much more) than the cheaper consumer units. So based on the performance you need and the SSD you have, it is still prudent to manually over provision with unpartitioned space. Note that some vendors will tell you about their over provisioning and others don’t. -- Paul Kraus paul@kraus-haus.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?08306F31-955B-4710-B20B-4F2ABE0CBA56>