Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:57:08 +0100 From: Paul Floyd <paulf2718@gmail.com> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Valgrind on arm64 Message-ID: <534fdf54-49f5-426a-8d35-74576ef254e7@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86cyrwao4q.fsf@peasant.tower.home> References: <ada8f8ee-0c5f-419e-bca9-17393d730aea@gmail.com> <86o7bh9pwj.fsf@peasant.tower.home> <e282616a-6ef1-4074-bb2c-682d4bc7c231@gmail.com> <86cyrwao4q.fsf@peasant.tower.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14-03-24 15:17, Dmitry Salychev wrote: > > Paul, > > This is what I'm getting: > > == 701 tests, 4 stderr failures, 0 stdout failures, 0 stderrB failures, > 0 stdoutB failures, 9 post failures == > memcheck/tests/descr_belowsp (stderr) > memcheck/tests/manuel1 (stderr) > memcheck/tests/supp_unknown (stderr) > none/tests/socket_close (stderr) > > I've got less tests executed though. I'll try to find something else to > test, but this box is usually used for the DPAA2 drivers development, > i.e. nothing specific is installed there. Hi Dmitry There are tests that depend on various things like CPU features detected and whether the mqueuefs + sctp modules have been loaded. The biggest dependency is on gdb - 23 of them. Otherwise that looks a lot like what I get on my RPi 5. A+ Paul
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?534fdf54-49f5-426a-8d35-74576ef254e7>