Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:20:54 +0000 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: k8temp driver Message-ID: <EA306AE5-2F80-4B9A-A3D8-A90466C5771A@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <86fxvzrvlf.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <A611E395-3531-4026-B8B3-5EFA72BA48E1@FreeBSD.org> <86abm82wvx.fsf@ds4.des.no> <375A934D-77AA-4601-8E21-47AE4C3603EE@FreeBSD.org> <86fxvzrvlf.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 11, 2008, at 10:12 PM, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org> writes: >> Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> writes: >>> Is there any way you can have it report the higher of these two as >>> dev.cpu.N.temperature, for compatibility with coretemp(4)? This =20 >>> will >>> make life much easier for system monitoring software (munin, nagios >>> etc) >> Yes, I could try that, but what namespace (compatible with >> dev.cpu.N.temperature) do you suggest? >> dev.cpu.N.temperature >> dev.cpu.N.temperature2 ? > > As I wrote (see quoted text above), just have dev.cpu.N.temperature > report the highest of the two. Oops, sorry. Had a rough day. Regards. -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?EA306AE5-2F80-4B9A-A3D8-A90466C5771A>