Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:51:55 -0500 From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@chuckr.org> To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no> Cc: bv@wjv.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a better lesskey helper Message-ID: <4736603B.7070800@chuckr.org> In-Reply-To: <86hcjuglzz.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <20071109222421.037E116A494@hub.freebsd.org> <20071109224531.GA58036@wjv.com> <4734EA16.5090800@chuckr.org> <86hcjuglzz.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<descriptions of my 3 suggestions> > > None of that will happen. You are free to use your own lesspipe.sh on > your own system, or install sysutils/most from ports, but the base > system's lesspipe.sh will not change, LESSOPEN will not be defined in > the default environment, and zless will stay. > OK. That's, I guess, what I was after. It seems that some folks have lost my point, which was to see if there was any support for improving the currently installed lesspipe.sh. Since we already had one, and the changes are clearly useful to programmers, it seemed a likely bet, but if you're that dead set against it, OK, it's dropped. I got suggestions from several folks to do things like go look up other less users, but they didn't see that wasn't my intention, I wanted to see about improving our lesspipe.sh. I actually still disagree, but it's surely not worth any more discussion. It's dropped. I'll just maintain my own here. Easy enough to do. > DES
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4736603B.7070800>