Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:47:31 +0100
From:      "Liam J. Foy" <liamfoy@sepulcrum.org>
To:        Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>
Cc:        Johnson David <davidjohnson@siemens.com>, freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org, 'cali' <calculus@softhome.net>
Subject:   Re: Explaining FreeBSD features
Message-ID:  <20050623194731.GA1264@anarion>
In-Reply-To: <86is04lvbd.fsf@xps.des.no>
References:  <6F2F8FD3FBCF7A489CB18912A4807EBA0E0866@mvwcim1a.acuson.com> <200506231348.06197.algould@datawok.com> <86is04lvbd.fsf@xps.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu(23)/Jun/05 - , Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> "Andrew L. Gould" <algould@datawok.com> writes:
> > On Thursday 23 June 2005 12:16 pm, Johnson David wrote:
> > > If by "works", you mean people leave the community, then you are
> > > correct. We all know what "F" in "RTFM" means. While we may not say
> > > it with those words anymore, we still often say it with the same
> > > abusive attitude. It's far more productive to say "RTM" than "RTFM".
> > I have, on occasion, used "RTFM", ignoring the "F"; but not thinking
> > about whether the reader would ignore it as well -- poor form on my
> > part.  I will certainly drop the "F" in the future.
> 
> Why?  Everybody knows the F stands for Fine :)
> 

Wow, is that DES writing an email with a smiley face in it? Maybe god does exist
after all.

-- 
		- Liam J. Foy
		liamfoy@sepulcrum.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050623194731.GA1264>