Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 22:33:33 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Kaarthik Sivakumar <kaarthik@comcast.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xemacs-devel port Message-ID: <20040324063333.GA44331@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <86oeqmq0hg.fsf@comcast.net> References: <200403231920.i2NJK4Bx004045@peedub.jennejohn.org> <86oeqmq0hg.fsf@comcast.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 12:26:35AM -0500, Kaarthik Sivakumar wrote: > >>> "GJ" =3D=3D Gary Jennejohn <garyj@jennejohn.org> writes: > GJ> Wouldn't hurt since I, the maintainer, can't get into freefall to > GJ> do any commits. >=20 > Ok, I will file a pr. >=20 > GJ> This is really a nit! xemacs has bigger problems, but what the > GJ> heck. >=20 > I know, but a user did mention on the xemacs-beta mailing list that > 21.5 is gamma and that raised concerns there about our packaging. So.. >=20 > What bigger problems do you see with xemacs? I run > compiled-from-source xemacs 21.5.x and other than standard beta > software problems with xemacs in general (ie not FreeBSD specific), > everything seems ok. I use compiled-from-source 21.4 at work and that > is quite good. Any chance you could submit a patch to update the ports to the current versions? They're a bit behind right now. Kris --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAYSu9Wry0BWjoQKURAivhAJ42P1LenoaD75zqjMpdL8vcqtiJgwCgvwFn NvqpLdWo0jXxFFqepDm+qOg= =MB/4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040324063333.GA44331>