Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 07:16:40 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: FUJISHIMA Satsuki <sf@FreeBSD.org> Cc: clefevre@poboxes.com, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: port naming convention (was Re: isc-dhcp3) Message-ID: <20010313071640.A74820@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <86pufl4sd8.wl@cheerful.com>; from sf@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 12:10:27AM %2B0900 References: <200103130235.f2D2Z7I04680@gits.dyndns.org> <20010312185108.A33699@dragon.nuxi.com> <86pufl4sd8.wl@cheerful.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 12:10:27AM +0900, FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote: > By the way, how about PKGNAMESUFFIX=-beta ? > > pkg_add -r isc-dhcp-beta or > pkg_add -r isc-dhcp3 Sounds like change for change sake. What is wrong with "isc-dhcp3" which we've used for quite a while now? Once version 3 is released (maybe after a patchlevel or two), I would advocate a repocopy to `isc-dhcp' and a package name change to just "isc-dhcp"; and either cvs rm `isc-dhcp2', or change the package name to "isc-dhcp2". -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010313071640.A74820>