Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 17:50:29 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Cc: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bigger boot block size? Message-ID: <760.1126453829@phk.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:34:29 %2B0200." <86y863k70q.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <86y863k70q.fsf@xps.des.no>, =?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= writes: >We also need to fix gstripe, gmirror etc. so they place their metadata >at the start of the provider instead of at the end. There are perfectly good arguments for metadata at front and metadata at the end and none of the arguments is definitive. In GEOM it is a private matter for the classes in question, and as long as they handle it properly, I have no issues with any placement of metadata. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?760.1126453829>