Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:24:21 -0600 From: Nikolas Britton <freebsd@nbritton.org> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... Message-ID: <42106E45.9000700@nbritton.org> In-Reply-To: <883004242.20050214061632@wanadoo.fr> References: <9C4E897FB284BF4DBC9C0DC42FB34617641AE6@mvaexch01.acuson.com> <883004242.20050214061632@wanadoo.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Anthony Atkielski wrote: >Johnson David writes: > > > >>Agree and disagree. While FreeBSD is well suited for the server, it's >>also well suited for the desktop. >> >> > >Mac OS X is the only type of UNIX well suited to the desktop, and even >OS X lags far behind Windows. > Your spell checker must not have been working because your sentence should have read like this: Mac OS X is the only type of UNIX well suited to the desktop, and even windows lags far behind OS X. No need to thank me and your welcome :-).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42106E45.9000700>