Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 20:32:33 +0000 From: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@technokratis.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: UMA not reentrant / possible memory leak Message-ID: <20030729203233.GA54357@technokratis.com> In-Reply-To: <89068.1059516558@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <88569.1059513090@critter.freebsd.dk> <89068.1059516558@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 12:09:18AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <88569.1059513090@critter.freebsd.dk>, Poul-Henning Kamp writes: > > > >[I'm CC'ing current because this seems to have a significant negative > >impact on -current kernel stability, and we can use some more data, > >in particular on non-i386 SMP machines] > > I just committed a workaround for this problem, until JeffR can > find time to hunt it down. > > People running 5.1 and possibly 5.0 on SMP kernels may want to apply > this patch: Thank you so much for doing this. I was going to do this myself but had to leave the office. Hopefully Jeff will have a chance to take a look at it otherwise I`ll be glancing at it tomorrow. Also, it would be nice if those suffering from recent problems with kmem_map exhaustion on 5.1 try this and note whether or not it gets rid of your panics. Regards, -- Bosko Milekic * bmilekic@technokratis.com * bmilekic@FreeBSD.org TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http://www.technokratis.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030729203233.GA54357>