Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:12:30 -0800 From: Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>, freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: SMBv1 Deprecation / SMBv2 support in FreeBSD Message-ID: <CAG6CVpVPyzjW%2Bq1RM50EWQf3N5u3_yOSrKGp8fxgq%2BZaPUYQ3A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8abe794b-90ff-d577-3b75-75a02a411712@quip.cz> References: <CALJ5sFkKMGvhgRYzegikDTiTTyV1xtA_WYJW_gLkHFN9Oh0OqA@mail.gmail.com> <YTXPR01MB01893E3AAB21A03677998D2FDDDB0@YTXPR01MB0189.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CALJ5sFnMWGAGS8oyUvzXfq_Z4ZeRzgs==EDZf%2BqO-4O269qdiw@mail.gmail.com> <9b556cbe-f9f3-ab15-6fcd-71397d18c126@freebsd.org> <20170623104654.07e5a3e0@ernst.home> <45b0864b-680c-8fe0-f5a5-353b6373d069@freebsd.org> <YTXPR01MB0189251BCE0A17B8D0C51514DDD80@YTXPR01MB0189.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CALJ5sF=_9=-UK%2B6NyWg1Wp%2BcZZwu%2BSVDMLUjirjWD9DrHy%2BzEQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170624045543.GY39245@kduck.kaduk.org> <CALJ5sFm%2BeKPonELuo2gTYR88qQz4mocFbd6fOVrTWu5FoPeWcg@mail.gmail.com> <b09c975c-e627-feca-a9a6-c01cddd5d848@quip.cz> <201912191647.xBJGleRa028173@higson.cam.lispworks.com> <f6c86809-1223-a622-1ccb-943dc148d9b9@quip.cz> <CAOtMX2g=mtH=8Q795Tge_0H9MLmfRqwHLbC-0uN4_AZuxxm%2BuQ@mail.gmail.com> <8abe794b-90ff-d577-3b75-75a02a411712@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Any smb2/3 port definitely isn=E2=80=99t landing in 11.3, so there=E2=80=99= s similar constraints there (in addition to being vaporware). :-) On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 12:49 Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote: > Alan Somers wrote on 2019/12/19 21:26: > > [...] > > > I think you should give it a shot. I rewrote the FUSE kernel module fo= r > > FreeBSD 12.1. Some of the changes, like to cacheing, could have big > > effects on smb performance. And cem made some changes in 2018 to the > > I/O size which led to big improvements in other file systems' > > performance, too. At the very least a benchmark would be interesting. > > I know you made many changes in FUSE unfortunately our production > servers are on 11.3. They will be upgraded later in Q2 2020. > I believe FUSE works much better now but smbnetfs is still kind of > complicated to use globally from fstab instead of per user. > I will try to find some 12.1 machine and try to benchmark it with > smbnetfs in January. I will let you know. > > Kind regards > Miroslav Lachman > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAG6CVpVPyzjW%2Bq1RM50EWQf3N5u3_yOSrKGp8fxgq%2BZaPUYQ3A>