Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 23:59:20 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: josh.carroll@gmail.com Cc: Maxim Khitrov <mkhitrov@gmail.com>, Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building a new workstation - dual or quad-core CPU for FreeBSD 7? Message-ID: <46EC55B8.2090107@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <8cb6106e0709151446x4c54a520u2d5cd543ba1541e@mail.gmail.com> References: <26ddd1750709141351i3646e9bdg8d8b7e93461167f9@mail.gmail.com> <bef9a7920709141441r5c228a8bu1fcf2ea15868c3c@mail.gmail.com> <26ddd1750709151014x2112b022r9bcb999fbf1e7e49@mail.gmail.com> <46EC270A.3020100@FreeBSD.org> <8cb6106e0709151421h7bfdeb6fo7dc671820294e9c7@mail.gmail.com> <46EC4F59.7070104@FreeBSD.org> <8cb6106e0709151435p72cd328by63895421f3a63ea4@mail.gmail.com> <46EC50DA.6000104@FreeBSD.org> <8cb6106e0709151446x4c54a520u2d5cd543ba1541e@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Josh Carroll wrote: >> That's good to know. You should be using libthr for threaded >> performance though :) That benchmark is probably almost all userland >> though, so performance may not suffer much from libpthread. > > Oh I wasn't sure if libthr was the preferred thread library for 6.2 > also (I'd heard that was the case for -CURRENT). > > I should look into whether ffmpeg can be built with libthr instead and > compare performance. Somewhat off topic, so I'll leave it at that, but > thanks again for the great info. I'm really looking forward to > 7.0-RELEASE, obviously :) Yeah, it is preferred on 6.x too (libkse has truly atrocious performance). It's trivial to change it over, just add an entry to /etc/libmap.conf: libpthread.so.2 libthr.so.2 Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46EC55B8.2090107>