Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 20:58:42 +0200 From: Michael Grimm <trashcan@ellael.org> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Understanding blacklistd blocklists -- 'bad user' doesn't get blocked Message-ID: <E409A171-D3E9-4711-BE75-53F25BD27EE0@ellael.org> In-Reply-To: <91FB3707-BE92-4B35-ACD6-08AB6E8735B5@nxg.name> References: <91FB3707-BE92-4B35-ACD6-08AB6E8735B5@nxg.name>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Norman Gray <gray@nxg.name> wrote: > I see that in January last year, 'tanis' noted the same thing in the = forum [4], and remarked that a patched version of blacklistd.c, which = incremented the wickedness count for such users, didn't cause any = surprising problems. Is there a case for having BL_BADUSER = optionally/configurably increment the wickedness counter? Yeah, that's something bothering me for a while now, and, raising hand, = I wouldn't make it "optionally/configurably", I do opt for treating = those break-in attempts to user accounts as blacklisting worth as those = for administrator accounts! Regards, Michael=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E409A171-D3E9-4711-BE75-53F25BD27EE0>