Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 06:55:50 -0400 From: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> To: Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: nvme detached Message-ID: <1b81f13a-7fc3-f711-dc6a-be30c29f3c5a@langille.org> In-Reply-To: <93a02a57-9f7b-473a-a63f-1c541fdd2225@gmail.com> References: <a703ce19-ea5d-48ca-8fc6-c1f1418e3131@www.fastmail.com> <3b332fd8-24be-5a2f-15a8-630edb2a7226@gmail.com> <5ff30e22-d355-4a0c-b13b-02ac709f0fbc@www.fastmail.com> <dd806dc5-86b8-a060-e919-46cb0976180d@gmail.com> <e0282e05-2a65-4fb4-9d89-c687e8a7cb98@www.fastmail.com> <a539b43d-b32e-0636-a9cb-4928c66b08d4@langille.org> <93a02a57-9f7b-473a-a63f-1c541fdd2225@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Graham Perrin wrote on 8/18/21 11:46 PM: > > Thanks > > If/when you begin using the new disk, then maybe give the old disk > entirely to UFS for a run of StressDisk (or whatever you like) to tell > whether there was/is a problem with the old … > > (Copied to the list at Dan's request.) The theory being that UFS gives a different test result? -- Dan Langille dan@langille.org : https://langille.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1b81f13a-7fc3-f711-dc6a-be30c29f3c5a>