Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:35:52 +0100
From:      Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: IPv6-only network--is NAT64+DNS64 really this easy now?
Message-ID:  <20190625113552.369ccee676de102a867cf618@sohara.org>
In-Reply-To: <93a8bcd3-df22-7f9b-ef42-2791987eb7c7@qeng-ho.org>
References:  <5e24739b-bbd0-d94a-5b0e-53fdeba81245@bluerosetech.com> <CANJ8om6WmNQWibnSCMR2hf09he-wWBUnBmY5Mnn7%2BNtvUHhcBQ@mail.gmail.com> <19784363-6543-ccc1-b13f-5f1a67dc10d1@bluerosetech.com> <20190625071943.vwswhj2lh6ctj4vy@deathbolt.927589452.space> <93a8bcd3-df22-7f9b-ef42-2791987eb7c7@qeng-ho.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:17:30 +0100
Arthur Chance <freebsd@qeng-ho.org> wrote:

> Really? My ISP (Zen in the UK) gives you a /48 as standard (plus a /64
> just for the link to them), and everything I've seen about IPv6 suggests
> /48 or /56 assignments are the norms.

	That's the design, /64 for networks and larger assignments for
groups of networks.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190625113552.369ccee676de102a867cf618>