Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:35:52 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6-only network--is NAT64+DNS64 really this easy now? Message-ID: <20190625113552.369ccee676de102a867cf618@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <93a8bcd3-df22-7f9b-ef42-2791987eb7c7@qeng-ho.org> References: <5e24739b-bbd0-d94a-5b0e-53fdeba81245@bluerosetech.com> <CANJ8om6WmNQWibnSCMR2hf09he-wWBUnBmY5Mnn7%2BNtvUHhcBQ@mail.gmail.com> <19784363-6543-ccc1-b13f-5f1a67dc10d1@bluerosetech.com> <20190625071943.vwswhj2lh6ctj4vy@deathbolt.927589452.space> <93a8bcd3-df22-7f9b-ef42-2791987eb7c7@qeng-ho.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:17:30 +0100 Arthur Chance <freebsd@qeng-ho.org> wrote: > Really? My ISP (Zen in the UK) gives you a /48 as standard (plus a /64 > just for the link to them), and everything I've seen about IPv6 suggests > /48 or /56 assignments are the norms. That's the design, /64 for networks and larger assignments for groups of networks. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190625113552.369ccee676de102a867cf618>