Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 21:19:52 +0100 From: Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de> To: "@lbutlr" <kremels@kreme.com>, FreeBSD <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: OpenSSL multiple names? Message-ID: <5c40981d-b87a-9351-1579-0e0a6e552b8c@gwdg.de> In-Reply-To: <944CDA27-93F9-4E02-B799-F8FD37D42D61@kreme.com> References: <0AF06B02-4203-4CF1-9F73-6B6D95283F3E@kreme.com> <20200207005501.j5avkiietunh5ipz@icepick.vmeta.jp> <D01B694B-9ABA-4347-B8CE-973D307A6C45@kreme.com> <944CDA27-93F9-4E02-B799-F8FD37D42D61@kreme.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 07.02.20 um 19:16 schrieb @lbutlr: > On 07 Feb 2020, at 11:06, @lbutlr <kremels@kreme.com> wrote: >> I updated openssl in January, and as I said it has been recompiled several times > > To be clear, I did everything that UPDATING 20200101 mentions, including reinstalling all ports, changing make.conf, etc. > > But all along, the system has reported that the version is openssl111-1.1.1, until 05 Feb. BTW, there is no new version of openssl listed in Postmaster and the distill in security/openssl says the date is Wed Sep 11 02:04:23 MDT 2019. > > 👹 root # cat security/openssl/distinfo [11:14] [/usr/ports] > TIMESTAMP = 1568189063 > SHA256 (openssl-1.1.1d.tar.gz) = 1e3a91bc1f9dfce01af26026f856e064eab4c8ee0a8f457b5ae30b40b8b711f2 > SIZE (openssl-1.1.1d.tar.gz) = 8845861 > > > Did you try 'portmaster -o security/openssl openssl111-1.1.1d' (with DEFAULT_VERSIONS= ssl=openssl, instead ssl=openssl111)? For me, that worked.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5c40981d-b87a-9351-1579-0e0a6e552b8c>