Date: Fri, 21 Apr 1995 18:06:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com> To: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) Cc: jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Minutes of the Thursday, April 13th core team meeting in Berkeley. Message-ID: <199504220106.SAA20941@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <9504220036.AA06063@cs.weber.edu> from "Terry Lambert" at Apr 21, 95 06:36:36 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > With respect, S^3 is something that students fall prey to. You > > > might argue that companies do so as well; I susbmit that these > > > are not successful companies. > > [ ... I've seen S^3 at it's evil worst ... ] > > I cheated. By definition, a company that has fallen victim to S^3 > will not be successful. If it is, then it hasn't been a victim. We're clearly inside the 20% zone where Terry is completely and utterly off the mark. IBM "not successful" ???? -- Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc. 'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent' => 'no rude people are relevant'
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504220106.SAA20941>