Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 17:09:31 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Cc: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Rsh/Rlogin/Rcmd & friends Message-ID: <20000915170931.X40658@radon.gryphonsoft.com> In-Reply-To: <97878.969054281@winston.osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com on Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 02:44:41PM -0700 References: <will@physics.purdue.edu> <97878.969054281@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 02:44:41PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > Hmmm. So that begs the question: What would you argue should _not_ be > packages and what would be your grounds for such argument in those > cases? Basic stuff like /bin/cp and other /bin/*, /sbin/* and so forth, with certain exceptions. Of course, the only reason why I'd say this is because: wouldn't "packages" be more difficult to maintain than the source? Or am I on crack again? Perhaps it's not that hard at all, and everything should be packaged. -- Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> <will@FreeBSD.org> GCS/E/S @d- s+:+ a--- C++ UB++++$ P+ L- E--- W+ N-- !o ?K w--- O- M+ V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X+ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+ G++ e>++++ h! r- y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000915170931.X40658>