Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:58:35 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Phil Rosenthal <pr@isprime.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: >2GB Bugs still exist in FreeBSD 4.9 ? Message-ID: <20040224105631.J48887@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <9B152AA8-6676-11D8-8B23-000A958F0F6A@isprime.com> References: <05F984A0-665D-11D8-8B23-000A958F0F6A@isprime.com> <9B152AA8-6676-11D8-8B23-000A958F0F6A@isprime.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Phil Rosenthal wrote: > I haven't touched the VM_KMEM_SIZE/VM_KMEM_SIZE_MAX options, however. > Reading the LINT notes, this seems unrelated... Are you sure that's a > necessary change? Honestly, its been so long now that I'm not 100% certain exactly what I was addressing with the VM_KMEM_* stuff ... I do alot on our servers with unionfs, which tends to require some settings to be increased (ie. vnodes) to quite high values ... I *think* I raised KVA_PAGES *because* I needed to raise VM_KMEM_SIZE* to accommodate those increases ... but, again, it was ages ago ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040224105631.J48887>