Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 23:43:11 +0200 From: mxb <mxb@alumni.chalmers.se> To: "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ZFS: ZIL device export/import Message-ID: <2753912E-0B91-4F73-B956-9D558F16EEAE@alumni.chalmers.se> In-Reply-To: <9EE9328B-40B1-4510-B404-242D0F2C7697@alumni.chalmers.se> References: <5A2824CA-2A67-47FA-AB27-20C6EBD2C501@alumni.chalmers.se> <51699B8E.7050003@platinum.linux.pl> <BCBD7CDE-1BBB-4855-9240-897770FEF822@alumni.chalmers.se> <op.wvhrfrhj8527sy@pinky> <2DE8AD5E-B84C-4D88-A242-EA30EA4A68FD@alumni.chalmers.se> <op.wvhyvkzx8527sy@pinky> <9EE9328B-40B1-4510-B404-242D0F2C7697@alumni.chalmers.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks everyone, whom replied! //mxb On 14 apr 2013, at 12:01, mxb <mxb@alumni.chalmers.se> wrote: >=20 > Well, I'm trying to preclude any undesired effect in the whole setup, = as this is going to production. >=20 > SAS-link might not be a bottleneck here and I'm overreacting. >=20 > Locally ,on per HU basis, I have 6Gbit/s SAS/SATA. Both card and = disks(SSD) attached to it. > SAS Expander is also 6Gbit/s, attaching 10k RPM SAS mechanical disks = on JBOD. >=20 > I use Intel 520 SSD and Pulsar SSD in this setup. > ZIL resided locally on Intel SSD(per HU), but now will probably move = to Pulsar SSD(moved to JBOD as those disks have dual SAS/SATA link). = L2ARC resided on Pulsar (Pulsar was in each HU. eg. I have 2x Pulsar). >=20 > Looks like I have to re-design the whole setup, as of ZIL. >=20 > //mxb >=20 >=20 > On 13 apr 2013, at 22:51, Ronald Klop <ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org> = wrote: >=20 >> I thought the idea of ZIL is a fast buffer before the write to slow = disk. Are you really sure the SAS expander is the bottleneck in the = system instead of the disks? >=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2753912E-0B91-4F73-B956-9D558F16EEAE>