Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      06 May 2002 12:23:36 -0700
From:      Max Okumoto <okumoto@ucsd.edu>
To:        Antoine Beaupre <anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx>
Cc:        Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.freebsd.org>, libh@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: util vs tools
Message-ID:  <hfadrdxepz.fsf@multivac.sdsc.edu>
In-Reply-To: Antoine Beaupre's message of "Mon, 6 May 2002 13:49:43 -0400"
References:  <A586394A-6119-11D6-B538-0050E4A0BB3F@anarcat.ath.cx>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
You guys are right.  We should only have one.  It was just 
habit from a previous project where they seperated scripts 
from tools which were build from src.  I will move all my stuff 
into tools.  I would also like to move find_classes_descriptions.pl
into tools.

                        Max Okumoto 

Antoine Beaupre <anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx> writes:
> Well, as far as I can remember, both didn't exist until recently.
> 
> A.
> 
> Le Lundi 6 mai 2002, à 01:39 , Jordan Hubbard a écrit :
> 
> > Probably historical - I don't see any problem with consolidating them.
> >
> >> Why have a util *AND* tools directory?
> >>
> >> Seems to me the utils in there should be both in tools *or* util. I'd
> >> rather have them in tools.
> >>
> >> A.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?hfadrdxepz.fsf>