Date: 23 Apr 1999 09:15:52 +0200 From: Frode Vatvedt Fjeld <frodef@acm.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lnc0: broke for us between 3.1 and 4.0? Message-ID: <2h3e1rbydz.fsf@dslab7.cs.uit.no> In-Reply-To: paul@originative.co.uk's message of "Tue, 20 Apr 1999 00:16:37 %2B0100" References: <A6D02246E1ABD2119F5200C0F0303D10FEF0@octopus>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
paul@originative.co.uk writes: > > From: Richard Tobin [mailto:richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk] > > Is this fix going into stable? (I'm a little surprised that such a > > change was considered appropriate for the stable branch in the first > > place.) > > I didn't think the memory allocation change was in stable but I may merge > the lnc changes back into -stable anyway since it's a cleaner way of doing > things. > > I've got some other lnc problems to fix first though. Will this take very long? Because my "stable" source tree has not produced a working kernel for me for several weeks because of this. And does this all mean that if I want my kernel source tree to be consistent more often than not (and any errors be fixed as soon as possible), I'd be better off switching from -stable to -current? -- Frode Vatvedt Fjeld To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2h3e1rbydz.fsf>