Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 11:59:34 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> To: David Chisnall <theraven@freebsd.org> Cc: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: eventfd lookalike in FreeBSD ? Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmon9qUMAZFQ7_7E_52iPVjgMGx9wrhDWcN0zUsHDRf_rWw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <A9A05570-A617-4CC5-BB9D-23DFD790BB86@FreeBSD.org> References: <20150728121949.GA64588@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <CAJ-VmoniGM2wv01zn_%2B%2BF-fLOq4mZ5FFTZRX_dYLww51Aq-iJQ@mail.gmail.com> <74DCC090-6AA7-43B8-81A1-DF66BC357489@FreeBSD.org> <CAJ-VmokaoTKb05BBaNXpbqHTnSjn5QvXsfGAY7Y%2BcdjJPPSvUA@mail.gmail.com> <A9A05570-A617-4CC5-BB9D-23DFD790BB86@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28 July 2015 at 10:42, David Chisnall <theraven@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 28 Jul 2015, at 18:33, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Windows has had this for years. It makes async network programming >> with thread worker queues significantly less abusive. > > Can you do the same with Solaris completion ports? It might be a good source of inspiration for a good API if so. I don't think you can do it with the solaris event ports. I don't know about their more later stuff. -a
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmon9qUMAZFQ7_7E_52iPVjgMGx9wrhDWcN0zUsHDRf_rWw>