Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:24:03 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Guillaume Bibaut <freebsd-security@iaelu.net> Cc: "Herbert J. Skuhra" <herbert@oslo.ath.cx>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compilation problem since SA-15:25 for FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE Message-ID: <86wpu4bw7w.fsf@desk.des.no> In-Reply-To: <AA734831-0FE8-4E8B-BEED-64B9D020C201@iaelu.net> (Guillaume Bibaut's message of "Tue, 27 Oct 2015 16:21:16 %2B0100") References: <4D69BAFF-7447-4A1F-ABB8-686CA34090F3@iaelu.net> <20151027114642.GA7848@oslo.ath.cx> <4043BA45-F5A5-4218-93F2-C320DE65EB6D@iaelu.net> <20151027125913.GB7848@oslo.ath.cx> <20151027150144.GD7848@oslo.ath.cx> <AA734831-0FE8-4E8B-BEED-64B9D020C201@iaelu.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Guillaume Bibaut <freebsd-security@iaelu.net> writes: > Herbert J. Skuhra <herbert@oslo.ath.cx> writes: > > OK, with 'patch -p0 < /path/to/ntp-102.patch' I get only [...] > As far as I know, the SA does not mention 'patch -p0'. Shouldn=E2=80=99t = this > be mentioned? BSD patch(1) assumes -p0. GNU patch(1) does not. I assume Herbert is used to GNU patch(1) and used -p0 out of habit. It is harmless, but not necessary. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86wpu4bw7w.fsf>