Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 02:23:52 -0500 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Edho P Arief <edhoprima@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> Subject: Re: gpart -b 34 versus gpart -b 1024 Message-ID: <AANLkTimpeKJhqtihuOFwU%2BtQZeCVXy0-fbYUsoGgN%2BeF@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=RGe7ygDYpF2u3BN4oPYSgyUUijOuLnz2q=XXY@mail.gmail.com> References: <4C4BA50B.6050507@langille.org> <4C4BB672.3090109@langille.org> <AANLkTinKEBb5S9REK3nn8GF3U=jRAtYMBBfsC5TB8Xj4@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=RGe7ygDYpF2u3BN4oPYSgyUUijOuLnz2q=XXY@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 2:22 AM, Edho P Arief <edhoprima@gmail.com> wrote: > > shouldn't it start at 2049? Starting at 2048 means it starts at 2048th > logical block which is 512 bytes off from physical block, doesn't it? > <http://www.asciiribbon.org>; > blocks start at 0 -- Adam Vande More
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimpeKJhqtihuOFwU%2BtQZeCVXy0-fbYUsoGgN%2BeF>