Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 20:49:14 +0000 From: Dr Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> To: Simon Dick <simond@irrelevant.org> Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XEN i386 with PAE and zfs, trouble? Message-ID: <6C1E7D15-0607-44FC-8582-01652DBF7B58@tao.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=TQc9RiHM3V5gN0uiupr9E_C5w0fwZUiFLut2-@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTinp5-kHGePPtyiruxKVhWcioRrGwMAYe%2BygK76M@mail.gmail.com> <423DA028-1CDB-443F-B3F0-C610D6268484@tao.org.uk> <AANLkTi=TQc9RiHM3V5gN0uiupr9E_C5w0fwZUiFLut2-@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4 Mar 2011, at 17:12, Simon Dick wrote: >> Is this a sensible assumption? Can I rely on this being a stable = configuration, or am I high?! :) >=20 > Not sure if it's just me, but you lose a fair few of ZFSs features if > you're not running it on actual hardware drives, etc, though I think > what you're planning may work it's not a setup I'd like to run myself > apart from to experiment with :) You think? I reckon that there's lots going for it, partitioning and = quotas, compression, snapshots, easy of upgrading (when I run out of = space and need more), etc etc. The underlying drives will be mirrored = already, so I don't need any mirror or raid functionality, but = everything else would be nice :). J.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6C1E7D15-0607-44FC-8582-01652DBF7B58>