Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:54:12 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PERFMON isn't operational on amd64 Message-ID: <201007271454.12244.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=V2h-0fyUZJxNJdCC%2BBGf-8X2%2BGRCNQ5mwLVh=@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTim3m4VX3sy6diTNna2Yb7i%2B4RQZ0kT6U7e_wqTU@mail.gmail.com> <20100727132350.GN22295@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <AANLkTi=V2h-0fyUZJxNJdCC%2BBGf-8X2%2BGRCNQ5mwLVh=@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, July 27, 2010 12:47:33 pm pluknet wrote: > On 27 July 2010 17:23, Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:43:00PM +0400, pluknet wrote: > >> Hi. > >> > >> What is a status of "options PERFMON" on amd64? > >> AFAIK PERFMON opt. was inherited from i386 port and never worked. > >> Does it make sense to wipe out perfmon part on amd64? > >> > >> Looking at cvs I see amd64/include/perfmon.h was never here. > > > > I think perfmon should be removed from i386 too. Would you prepare > > the patch ? > > > > Ok, attached. I think you want to remove CPUTIME_CLOCK_I586_PMC as well. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201007271454.12244.jhb>