Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 23:00:39 -0300 From: Rafael Henrique Faria <rafaelhfaria@cenadigital.com.br> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeNAS vs OpenSolaris vs Nexenta ZFS Benchmarks Message-ID: <AANLkTikz_58WxWO=ddwikG8eg9t2YjmSdx5sXSj-paB6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=_VVZYLjqCZ5oNSsqABWKsK-OObvxK46-_Kk17@mail.gmail.com> References: <4C8D234F.40204@quip.cz> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1009122134510.52130@fledge.watson.org> <201009121640.39157.josh@tcbug.org> <AANLkTi=_VVZYLjqCZ5oNSsqABWKsK-OObvxK46-_Kk17@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 21:15, Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> wrote: > > Using which target (iscsi-target or istgt)? Or are they both slow? > > This is a good question. I know that iscsi-target (ported from NetBSD some time ago) is too old, and don't respect the current iSCSI protocol. But the new implementation from Aoyama (istgt) is a lot better, and I don't know if the tested FreeNAS was already using the istgt. I am using istgt a while, and have some problems with it, and don't know about the performance... if someone have any notice about it... will be very good. -- Rafael Henrique da Silva Faria
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikz_58WxWO=ddwikG8eg9t2YjmSdx5sXSj-paB6>