Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 15:31:49 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS - moving from a zraid1 to zraid2 pool with 1.5tb disks Message-ID: <4D208C55.9080409@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=ec9=nE7rQ01Hwk-%2BbUc7CaFsh9f9a5wGLcWJV@mail.gmail.com> References: <4D1C6F90.3080206@my.gd> <op.vojfsirj8527sy@212-123-145-58.ip.telfort.nl> <4D1F442F.8060801@my.gd> <AANLkTi=ec9=nE7rQ01Hwk-%2BbUc7CaFsh9f9a5wGLcWJV@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/1/11 6:28 PM, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: > On 2 January 2011 02:11, Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd> wrote: > >> I remember getting rather average performance on v14 but Jean-Yves >> reported good performance boosts from upgrading to v15. > > that was v28 :) > > saw no major difference between v14 and v15. > > JY Oopsie :) Seeing I for one will have no backups, I think I won't be using v28 on this box, and stick with v15 instead. Are there any views regarding the "best" implementation for a system ? I currently have a ZFS only system but I'm planning on moving it to UFS, with ZFS used only for mass storage. I understand ZFS root is much trickier, and my main fear is that if I somehow break ZFS (by upgrading to v28 for example) I won't be able to boot anymore, thus no repair process...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D208C55.9080409>