Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:35:35 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Artem Belevich <fbsdlist@src.cx> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: syscall provider naming convention. Re: kern/152822: [patch] DTrace: syscall provider for compat/freebsd32 Message-ID: <20101213103535.00005f3d@unknown> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=ehLNs8aeYfGUattetm7oMj8HhEB1Vnep9uAZk@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTi=z1_KWKmhqFjNYHZfgAyPgsUVvgJ0P29KOPpnZ@mail.gmail.com> <20101211215341.0000097c@unknown> <AANLkTi=ehLNs8aeYfGUattetm7oMj8HhEB1Vnep9uAZk@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 23:38:32 -0800 Artem Belevich <fbsdlist@src.cx> wrote: > Functionally both approaches are about the same functionally. Each has > pluses and minuses. Using module, though, looks somewhat cleaner. I agree. Bye, Alexander.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101213103535.00005f3d>